Academics Endnotes? No! by Christian Brady|Published July 12, 2011|2 comments I just needed to say it again. Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading... Related
Published September 13, 2009 SBL & Biblioblogging rundown 1 comment For those keeping track of this Daniel McClellan has links to a number of the blog posts from around Biblioblogdom that address […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published September 21, 2010 American Educational Crisis isn’t all that 4 comments Very interesting piece, “Education is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution…. It embodies a faith in the capabilities of ordinary people that the […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published March 15, 2009 Scrivener, Nisus Writer Pro, and Hebrew/Aramaic 3 comments Have any of you use Scrivener with NWP (best of all, incorporating right to left languages)? I know @Ihnatko uses it but […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published September 9, 2016 A warning to linguists from Milton The other day I came across this marvelous quote. With a wink and a smile, I offer this to my linguist friends. Of […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
2 thoughts on “Endnotes? No!”
amen and amen. i hate turning to the back of a page time and again to read the citation.
in fact, if i remember correctly, al franken wrote a chapter/article entitled, ‘how to lie with endnotes.’ it’s harder to cheat with footnotes.
So far no one in our field(s) has felt differently. But see the ongoing debate at the original post.