Academics Endnotes? No! by Christian Brady|Published July 12, 2011|2 comments I just needed to say it again. Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading... Related
Published February 25, 2011 Digitisation of Oxford D.Phil. theses 1 comment No, that is not a typo in the subject line, that is the Queen’s English! Yesterday I received a notice from the […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published July 1, 2023 50th Anniversary of the Oxford Centre for Hebrew & Jewish Studies Thirty years ago in August, Elizabeth and I were married. Over our honeymoon, I was encouraged to send in an application to […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published April 11, 2012 Sacred Techs: New blog post New blog: Academic Workflows on Mac A new blog about academic workflow on the Mac. Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published July 13, 2008 An Introduction – Harder than it looks 4 comments I am trying to finally knock out this article and as is often the case the introduction is proving the greatest challenge. […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
2 thoughts on “Endnotes? No!”
amen and amen. i hate turning to the back of a page time and again to read the citation.
in fact, if i remember correctly, al franken wrote a chapter/article entitled, ‘how to lie with endnotes.’ it’s harder to cheat with footnotes.
So far no one in our field(s) has felt differently. But see the ongoing debate at the original post.