Academics Endnotes? No! by Christian Brady|Published July 12, 2011|2 comments I just needed to say it again. Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading... Related
Published June 28, 2010 Ruth’s “Conversion” in Targum Ruth 4 comments As you all know I am working Targum Ruth. Those who know me well know that my interests are more with the […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published November 14, 2012 SBL – I knew you well 5 comments I feel as though I have severed a deep and passionate and complicated relationship. I feel a bit hollow inside. I am […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published January 4, 2012 Now THIS is the BEST footnote. Ever. By a wide margin. 12 comments With great thanks to Robert Holmstedt who sent it along. This is Michael V. Fox. 1987. Hebrew Studies 28:6-8. You all know […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published April 16, 2019 SBL Members receive 2 years of JSTOR From John Kutsko, the Executive Director of SBL. April 16, 2019 Dear Christian Brady, I am pleased to inform you that JSTOR has […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMoreRedditPrintLike this:Like Loading...
2 thoughts on “Endnotes? No!”
amen and amen. i hate turning to the back of a page time and again to read the citation.
in fact, if i remember correctly, al franken wrote a chapter/article entitled, ‘how to lie with endnotes.’ it’s harder to cheat with footnotes.
So far no one in our field(s) has felt differently. But see the ongoing debate at the original post.