Academics Endnotes? No! by Christian Brady|Published July 12, 2011|2 comments I just needed to say it again. Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMorePrintLike this:Like Loading... Related
Published January 5, 2016 RBL being put behind paywall 4 comments SBL members will have just gotten this email from Bob Buller of RBL. These sorts of decisions have to be made and […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMorePrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published January 17, 2011 SBL Updates Student Rules 1 comment This was forwarded on by a graduate student. I am glad that they are reconsidering the matter. Dear Student Member: The Executive […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMorePrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published September 6, 2010 Jim West twitters 2 comments Well, not literally of course. You will not find a twitter account for the Zwingli hagiographer. But in making a parenthetical comment […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMorePrintLike this:Like Loading...
Published October 23, 2017 Cognitive Offloading in Biblical Scholarship 2 comments It has been years since I have posted anything within the Biblioblogosphere echo chamber. (Hello? Is anyone still reading?) But this weekend […] Share this:EmailTweetShare on TumblrMorePrintLike this:Like Loading...
2 thoughts on “Endnotes? No!”
amen and amen. i hate turning to the back of a page time and again to read the citation.
in fact, if i remember correctly, al franken wrote a chapter/article entitled, ‘how to lie with endnotes.’ it’s harder to cheat with footnotes.
So far no one in our field(s) has felt differently. But see the ongoing debate at the original post.