Targuman Rotating Header Image

Jesus

Introduction to the Reel Jesus

Tonight is the first film in our local series “The Reel Jesus.” Here are my opening words.

Reel Jesus Introduction

Good evening. My name is Christian Brady and I am dean of the Schreyer Honors College and on behalf of the State College Theatre and the Film Collective I welcome you to the Reel Jesus Film Festival. In a moment I will outline the events of our evening, but first a few words about this series.

While I am an academic administrator, I am a scholar of ancient Judaism. I research and teach on the Judaism of the time of Jesus and the centuries following, often referred to as the “classical” or “golden period” of Judaism. Arguing over who Jesus was and what he might have said or did is an incredibly common occurrence among scholars (and for some it has even proved to be quite lucrative). Yet when we as scholars or clergy write or preach about Jesus we do so in a one-dimensional or linear fashion. You read the words or hear them spoken one after another even as I present to you now this brief introduction.

When a filmmaker presents to us their story of Jesus it is multivalent, three dimensional. They are able not only to select and choose the words which convey the story and the message, they also control the image, selecting the actors, their clothing, the environment, the lighting, the camera angles and shots. The film offers us an immersive experience.

The vocabulary that is available to the filmmaker goes far beyond that of the author, offering them a nearly infinite palette (if I may mix my metaphors) from which to draw. And just as the director can convey their message through the varied media of their medium, we the viewers have just as many opportunities to reinterpret and imagine what we once thought was so familiar and comfortable. I never considered Jesus as having such keen eyes. What does it mean that Judas is portrayed as a black man? How would I depict Satan?

Even those of us raised without any religious education have some image of Jesus, we have some concept of what he did and said. This series of films allows us to see other images and conceptions. Some will be familiar and others quite jarring. The goal, as literary critics are fond of saying, is to “problematize” Jesus, shake loose the stain glass windows present in our minds and offer a different realization.

Tonight we begin our series of four films with Paolo Pasolini’s The Gospel According to Matthew, a more traditional and yet far from conventional depiction of the Gospel story. Each movie will be introduced by a member of our community, either a scholar or a member of the clergy. After the film, following a short break, a panel of scholars and clergy will lead us in discussion and conversation about the film. Those of us on the panel will all keep our initial comments very brief so that we may open the floor to you, the audience.

Now I am pleased to introduce tonight’s panel. Our introduction to the film will be presented by Dr. Sherry Roush, Assoc Professor of Italian, Dept of Spanish, Italian & Portuguese. Other members of our panel include Paul Dilley, Assistant Professor in the history of early Christianity and New Testament studies, Dept of History, Allan Stoekl, Professor of French and Comparative Literature, Dept of French, and Rev. Paul Grabill, Pastor of The State College Assembly of God.

Please welcome Dr. Roush.


 

The Reel Jesus

This piece (or a version of it, I am over the word limit by 80 words) should appear in the Centre Daily Times in the near future. It is an introduction to an upcoming film series The Reel Jesus. The story is up! “Jesus is coming to a theater near you.

I believe that I can state, without doing any research whatsoever, not even firing up The Google, that Jesus is the single most discussed figure of all time. The number of books, films, songs, poems, paintings, frescos, and tattoos honoring, venerating, denigrating, and demystifying Jesus is innumerable. What each has in common is an attempt to understand and interpret this figure that some claim never existed and others worship as nothing less than God. As a scholar of biblical interpretation I was immediately enthusiastic when the State Theatre Film Collective began considering ideas for a series of films and the “Reel Jesus” emerged as a favorite theme.

Whether it is a work of static art such as Marc Chagall’s harrowing “White Crucifixion” or a film such as Monty Python’s irreverent Life of Brian, every artist (and scholar for that matter) is offering their own interpretation of Jesus, but they also provide a commentary on their own context, culture, and community. In 1938 Chagall painted a crucified Jesus, wrapped in a tallit, a Jewish prayer shawl, on a background of images from Kristallnacht in order to comment on the atrocities being committed against Jews during the Nazi era. The resulting juxtaposition of the central figure of Christianity enrobed in Judaism before scenes of anti-Semitic horror forces the viewer to reconsider the identity of the crucified Jesus.

The films selected for the Reel Jesus series were chosen because, like Chagall’s work, they each provide a very different angle by which one can consider this transformative figure. The series is bookended by two films that each seek to be straightforward retellings of the Gospel story. Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, once accused of atheism, based his 1964 film upon the Gospel of Matthew, primarily using the dialogue of the biblical text since he purportedly felt that “images could never reach the poetic heights of the text.”[1] Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ from 2004, on the other hand, famously has the dialogue in Aramaic and Latin, so that “the visual aspect of the film [would] be very strong, so that it wasn’t as dependent on the spoken word.”[2] Each director claimed to remain close to the source material yet each made decisions that dramatically impact the image of Jesus found in their films.

The two films in the middle of this Lenten cycle are quite different. Jesus Christ Superstar is the quintessential rock opera, but to reduce it to the Passion with electric guitars and long hair (and shiny, shiny helmets) would be to miss the brilliance of this work. The central figure is not Jesus, but Judas. Had we been with Jesus would we not have also questioned his path and worried with Judas,

“Jesus!

Youve started to believe

The things they say of you

You really do believe

This talk of God is true”?

To see Jesus through the eyes of the faithful and fearful friend is an enlightening experience.

The Life of Brian is different yet again in that it does not seek to tell the story of Jesus, but that of star-crossed Brian. Shot at the same location and sets as Franco Zeffirelli’s Jesus of Nazareth, first century Judean religion and politics are given the Monty Python treatment. In the process of making jokes about Latin grammar the Python gang manage to offer prescient commentary on the often blinding loyalty that religions can engender.

These films will be presented during Lent, the time of the Christian calendar for reflection and repentance, but they are not to be contained within the church. Presented at the State Theatre, a group of local clergy and scholars will facilitate discussion after each film, helping us all to see Jesus in a new light, albeit digitally enhanced.


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gospel_According_to_St._Matthew_(film)

[2] Interview with Peggy Noonan, http://www.rd.com/your-america-inspiring-people-and-stories/mel-gibson/article26802-2.html