[poll id=”18″]
You may also like
I have just now seen that Alan Lenzi has called me out for avoiding “the M word” (HT to Simon Holloway) To […]
Share this:
Many who read this blog are members of the Society of Biblical Literature or familiar with it, but many are not aware […]
Share this:
Or why didn’t God realize that the sheep weren’t going to do it for the Man? Gen. 2.18 Then the LORD God […]
Share this:
A really rather excellent piece about being busy. It is not just the usual “we are too busy! slow down!” For one […]
6 thoughts on “Poll: You tell me, was it 587 BCE or 586 BCE?”
I love that your question about this on Twitter a couple of days back is ranking higher than a Wikipedia page!
http://skitch.com/samharrelson/bdtsp/586-or-587-bce-google-search
Oh, and 587.
Now THAT is the measure of success! Thanks for posting this Sam:
By the way, this discussion from the b-Hebrew list that comes up in the Google search is actually pretty good.
So… the question is… to believe Wikipedia (587 BCE) or the Jewish Virtual Library (586 BCE)? When I entered your question in Google search, it gave me http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/The_Temple.html as the first ranked page.
Coincidentally that follows the scholarship in that older works say 586 (Telushkin as cited by JVL) and more recent scholarship that uses 587 (Wiki).
All of my student handouts say 587/586 BCE. Don’t even get me started about Solomon’s date.