<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Targuman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://targuman.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://targuman.org/blog</link>
	<description>Translating my thoughts into words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:21:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Teaching the Book of Ruth by Christian Brady</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/18/teaching-the-book-of-ruth/comment-page-1/#comment-77648</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6247#comment-77648</guid>
		<description>Thank you John. I hope to answer some of your (rhetorical) questions later, when I have more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you John. I hope to answer some of your (rhetorical) questions later, when I have more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hebrew Alphabet Soup &#8211; OSU Library by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/23/hebrew-alphabet-soup-osu-library/comment-page-1/#comment-77628</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6285#comment-77628</guid>
		<description>Two variations on vav, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two variations on vav, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hebrew Alphabet Soup &#8211; OSU Library by Christian Brady</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/23/hebrew-alphabet-soup-osu-library/comment-page-1/#comment-77578</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6285#comment-77578</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the simple answers are the best. Well done Aaron! I am sure you are correct! (Any idea what those last two &quot;paleo Hebrew&quot; letters are supposed to be?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the simple answers are the best. Well done Aaron! I am sure you are correct! (Any idea what those last two &#8220;paleo Hebrew&#8221; letters are supposed to be?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hebrew Alphabet Soup &#8211; OSU Library by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/23/hebrew-alphabet-soup-osu-library/comment-page-1/#comment-77566</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6285#comment-77566</guid>
		<description>They just typed ABCDE... and changed the font to Hebrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just typed ABCDE&#8230; and changed the font to Hebrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on משלי אדם &#8211; On reading handwritten Hebrew MSS by Adam Couturier</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/22/%d7%9e%d7%a9%d7%9c%d7%99-%d7%90%d7%93%d7%9d-on-reading-handwritten-hebrew-mss/comment-page-1/#comment-77248</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Couturier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6262#comment-77248</guid>
		<description>Chris, thank you for your kind words!  I appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thank you for your kind words!  I appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Teaching the Book of Ruth by John</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/18/teaching-the-book-of-ruth/comment-page-1/#comment-77201</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6247#comment-77201</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chris.

I don&#039;t get into date of writing much.  When all you scholars agree on dating, let me know. :)  We mentioned it was set in the same time as the book we had just studied (Judges, we have had one Ruth class).  

The &quot;power&quot; theme is interesting.  Was it strange for the woman to ask the man to marry her, (&quot;spread your wings...)?  I guess Boaz had done nothing because he was waiting on the first in line.  How was that man concerned about endangering his inheritance if he married Ruth?  

I generally tell them to ignore chapter divisions because they weren&#039;t part of the original text.  Psalms and Lamentations being exceptions.  I guess they did it pretty good here though.  In the first chapter, do you think Elimelech showed a lack of faith in Yahweh by leaving Israel during a famine?  On the book as a whole, I gather that the inclusion of Ruth in Christ&#039;s ancestry shows God&#039;s interest in the Gentiles even in the Old Testament.  There are other examples, of course.  Boaz comes across as an excellent model employer.  His respect for his workers seems to cause them to respect him.  The cultural angles have always fascinated me.  I wish I knew a lot more about that area.  How strange how Ruth and Boaz get together in the threshing floor scene seems to us.  Was it that unusual in that time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get into date of writing much.  When all you scholars agree on dating, let me know. <img src='http://targuman.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   We mentioned it was set in the same time as the book we had just studied (Judges, we have had one Ruth class).  </p>
<p>The &#8220;power&#8221; theme is interesting.  Was it strange for the woman to ask the man to marry her, (&#8220;spread your wings&#8230;)?  I guess Boaz had done nothing because he was waiting on the first in line.  How was that man concerned about endangering his inheritance if he married Ruth?  </p>
<p>I generally tell them to ignore chapter divisions because they weren&#8217;t part of the original text.  Psalms and Lamentations being exceptions.  I guess they did it pretty good here though.  In the first chapter, do you think Elimelech showed a lack of faith in Yahweh by leaving Israel during a famine?  On the book as a whole, I gather that the inclusion of Ruth in Christ&#8217;s ancestry shows God&#8217;s interest in the Gentiles even in the Old Testament.  There are other examples, of course.  Boaz comes across as an excellent model employer.  His respect for his workers seems to cause them to respect him.  The cultural angles have always fascinated me.  I wish I knew a lot more about that area.  How strange how Ruth and Boaz get together in the threshing floor scene seems to us.  Was it that unusual in that time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Philip Jenkins on &#8220;THE GOSPEL OF US&#8221; by The Gospel of Us (H/T: Christian Brady, a.k.a @targuman) - the running rev!</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/21/philip-jenkins-on-the-gospel-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-77113</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gospel of Us (H/T: Christian Brady, a.k.a @targuman) - the running rev!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6258#comment-77113</guid>
		<description>[...] by WP Greet Box WordPress PluginEarlier today I stumbled across Christian Brady&#8217;s post &#8220;Philip Jenkins on the &#8216;Gospel of Us.&#8217;&#8221; Immediately my interest was peaked. I&#8217;ve been a long-time fan of Jenkins and his work, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by WP Greet Box WordPress PluginEarlier today I stumbled across Christian Brady&#8217;s post &#8220;Philip Jenkins on the &#8216;Gospel of Us.&#8217;&#8221; Immediately my interest was peaked. I&#8217;ve been a long-time fan of Jenkins and his work, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Campbell on the intent of characters in the Hebrew Bible by Joseph Kelly</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/18/campbell-on-the-intent-of-characters-in-the-hebrew-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-76597</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6244#comment-76597</guid>
		<description>And again, I concur. Just because motivation is a tricky thing does not mean there are no thoughtful ways of engaging the text. Of course, this places the interpreter in a more vulnerable situation. It is much safer to hide behind the scientism of &quot;objective&quot; rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And again, I concur. Just because motivation is a tricky thing does not mean there are no thoughtful ways of engaging the text. Of course, this places the interpreter in a more vulnerable situation. It is much safer to hide behind the scientism of &#8220;objective&#8221; rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Campbell on the intent of characters in the Hebrew Bible by Christian Brady</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/18/campbell-on-the-intent-of-characters-in-the-hebrew-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-76595</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6244#comment-76595</guid>
		<description>Excellent point and a great example. Frankly all of Gen. 2-3 leaves open the question of the motives of &quot;characters,&quot; not least of whom is God. Why create the tree that they couldn&#039;t eat? Why put the serpent there (or make him crafty)? And so on. Of course I think we can have some thoughtful answers to these questions, but *motivation* is a tricky thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point and a great example. Frankly all of Gen. 2-3 leaves open the question of the motives of &#8220;characters,&#8221; not least of whom is God. Why create the tree that they couldn&#8217;t eat? Why put the serpent there (or make him crafty)? And so on. Of course I think we can have some thoughtful answers to these questions, but *motivation* is a tricky thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Campbell on the intent of characters in the Hebrew Bible by Joseph Kelly</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2012/05/18/campbell-on-the-intent-of-characters-in-the-hebrew-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-76556</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=6244#comment-76556</guid>
		<description>I agree with your skepticism. The problem lies in the assumption that actions and words have a single meaning/interpretation. The ambiguity of signifiers like a character&#039;s words and/or actions shifts some responsibility from the author to the reader in constructing meaning. I think problem is one of the significant contributing factors to the disagreement between Barr and Moberly on the truth(?)-telling serpent of Genesis 3. The text is inexplicit regarding the serpent&#039;s motivations and certain clues in the text work in different directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your skepticism. The problem lies in the assumption that actions and words have a single meaning/interpretation. The ambiguity of signifiers like a character&#8217;s words and/or actions shifts some responsibility from the author to the reader in constructing meaning. I think problem is one of the significant contributing factors to the disagreement between Barr and Moberly on the truth(?)-telling serpent of Genesis 3. The text is inexplicit regarding the serpent&#8217;s motivations and certain clues in the text work in different directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

