<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call me crazy! Religulously Maher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://targuman.org/blog/2008/10/01/call-me-crazy-religulously-maher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2008/10/01/call-me-crazy-religulously-maher/</link>
	<description>Translating my thoughts into words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:42:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delirious</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2008/10/01/call-me-crazy-religulously-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-36152</link>
		<dc:creator>Delirious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=2023#comment-36152</guid>
		<description>I think people need to understand the definition of athiest better.  If a person believes in God, but no religion, they would be considered agnostic, not athiest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people need to understand the definition of athiest better.  If a person believes in God, but no religion, they would be considered agnostic, not athiest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2008/10/01/call-me-crazy-religulously-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-36136</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=2023#comment-36136</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of plain blissful ignorance and straw men to these kinds of assertions by Maher and others.  he needs to read the Pew data more carefully. Unaffiliated has to do with one&#039;s association to a particular religious body.  The percentage of actual atheists who reject belief in God as he does is far slimmer.  Maybe he needs to get the atheist vote out a bit more to hit that 2% (rounded up) of atheists.  Actually Sarah Palin is technically &quot;unaffiliated&quot; since she claims not to hold membership at a church at the moment.

He and others like Dawkins, etc. simply don&#039;t understand the processes of secularization and fail to consider its sociological features time and again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of plain blissful ignorance and straw men to these kinds of assertions by Maher and others.  he needs to read the Pew data more carefully. Unaffiliated has to do with one&#8217;s association to a particular religious body.  The percentage of actual atheists who reject belief in God as he does is far slimmer.  Maybe he needs to get the atheist vote out a bit more to hit that 2% (rounded up) of atheists.  Actually Sarah Palin is technically &#8220;unaffiliated&#8221; since she claims not to hold membership at a church at the moment.</p>
<p>He and others like Dawkins, etc. simply don&#8217;t understand the processes of secularization and fail to consider its sociological features time and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
