<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed Reading?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://targuman.org/blog/2008/04/13/speed-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2008/04/13/speed-reading/</link>
	<description>Translating my thoughts into words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tilling</title>
		<link>http://targuman.org/blog/2008/04/13/speed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-26619</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://targuman.org/blog/?p=1448#comment-26619</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris,
I really didn&#039;t think 370-560 wpm was all that amazing - epsecially compared with the 2,000 word per minute claims. But I must say that I find the article you link to of some comfort in light of such claims. 
Having said that, I find it hard to believe that 300 wpm is the max. 
I would be more like 60 wpm in German, btw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris,<br />
I really didn&#8217;t think 370-560 wpm was all that amazing &#8211; epsecially compared with the 2,000 word per minute claims. But I must say that I find the article you link to of some comfort in light of such claims.<br />
Having said that, I find it hard to believe that 300 wpm is the max.<br />
I would be more like 60 wpm in German, btw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

